Skip to main content

(C) Karolina Grabowska on Pexels

How digital design changes customer decisions

Sector: Charity, Financial

Team: Ruth, Sechele, Owain

Partner: Citizens Advice

Literature review

Simulation experiment

Interviews

Prototyping

How digital design changes customer decisions

We created a product simulation experiment to test how different designs of online checkouts influence the payment methods chosen by customers, looking in particular at Buy Now, Pay Later.

The Challenge

Online shopping offers customers a smooth, simple way of making a purchase. But Citizens Advice, the charity that offers confidential financial advice to millions of people every year, is concerned that some firms are designing online platforms in ways that act against the interests of customers. Citizens Advice therefore commissioned CogCo, working with Paul Adams, to devise an experiment that tested what the effect of different aspects of digital design had upon the choices and comprehension of customers. They were especially interested in the effect of different digital designs upon consumers’ decisions to choose to pay using ‘Buy Now, Pay Later’ products. These products enable customers to delay payments into the future and now account for 6% of all online purchases in the UK.

The Approach

We started by conducting research to enable us to understand existing product designs, and the cognitive biases that might affect consumers’ decisions in online environments. This included a literature review; a review of typical 'Buy Now, Pay Later' product design features; and expert interviews. We used this research to design a study in which we tested the effect of different design features upon customers’ propensity to pay with Buy Now, Pay Later products, rather than a debit or credit card.

The study took the form of an online randomised controlled trial in which we set 2,000 participants a hypothetical shopping task. This required them to purchase a pair of trainers using their preferred method of payment (debit or credit card versus 'Buy Now, Pay Later'). Our participants were randomly assigned to one of the four different prototypes of an online retail app, each of which was configured with slightly different features. This would enable us to see whether the different design elements changed the payment choices that people made along the way; and had an influence upon their comprehension of the different payment options.

The first version of the app was as close as possible to what you would typically find in an online checkout. It included brightly coloured branding for a fictitious 'Buy Now, Pay Later' product, which was accompanied by in-app marketing. This became our ‘Control’ condition (see below).

Figure 1: Screenshots from the control

(C) CogCo

The next of our four prototypes included more information about ‘Buy Now, Pay Later’ terms and conditions (‘Disclosures’). The third had the same extra information, but displayed it as a pop-up at the point of purchase (‘Pop Up’), which it was felt was more likely to be noticed by participants. The final version (‘Combined+’) included all the extra information from the Disclosures and Pop Up conditions. But it also removed the colourful branding and in-app marketing (see the comparison in Figure 2 below, which shows the payment screens of the Combined+ and the Control conditions).

Figure 2: Comparison of Combined+ (left) and Control (right) conditions on payment screen

After the participants had completed the task, we asked them a set of comprehension questions, to ascertain whether they had understood the terms and conditions that they were signing up for.

The Result

We found that the design of the prototypes did indeed have an impact, but in different ways. The Disclosure, Pop Up and Combined+ conditions all helped to improve participants’ comprehension of what they were signing up to. Participants were more likely to correctly answer questions about the nature of the product, and whether late fees would be applied if payments were missed.

Figure 3: Proportion of participants choosing to pay by 'Buy Now, Pay Later'

(C) CogCo

But it was only the Combined+ condition, in which the extra branding and in-app marketing had been removed, that affected the proportion of participants choosing to check out with buy now pay later products. And here, the effect was quite substantial: a 35% reduction. The results of the study have been used by Citizens Advice in their report on digital design, helping them to demonstrate that ‘design isn’t neutral - the way choices are presented to consumers … has a significant impact on what choices they make’.

“Our extensive experimental research has demonstrated that bad designs can be replaced with better, more consumer-focused design features which help people to make fully-informed decisions when using Buy Now, Pay Later”

-Citizens Advice

Read recommended case studies

Understanding the barriers to seeking out debt advice

In 2022, the Money & Pensions Service (MaPS) found that as many as 9.3 million adults across the UK were showing strong indications of needing debt advice. This is an increase of 800,000 compared to 2021, and doesn’t take account of more recent energy bill rises. Amongst other things, this group will be facing serious consequences for not being able to pay a priority bill - such as their rent or energy bill.

Helping More People to Save for a Rainy Day

Around a third of all people in the UK have less than £100 in savings. This means that tens of millions of people across the country have next to no financial buffer, should they encounter any form of financial challenge. A broken fridge, or an unexpected parking fine, for example, can lead to someone needing to borrow money that they subsequently find it difficult to repay. The team at Wagestream, a financial wellbeing app whose goal is to make money management easier and more accessible for people, recognised the severity of this problem amongst the 500,000+ users of their platform. They asked CogCo to work with them in helping them to build a new product that could help their users build up their financial resilience.

Understanding What Influences Job Decisions: Is Money All that Matters?

Governments and firms regularly grapple with the question of how to attract particular employees to their shores, to different sectors of the economy, or to their workplace rather than that of a competitor. Research intensive firms might want to attract the best scientists. Often just as urgently, there might be a critical need for low-paid employees in sectors in which local citizens are reluctant to work, such as fruit picking in the US and the UK. Or there may be a need to encourage citizens to take up private-sector roles in countries where the public sector is particularly attractive, such as in parts of the Middle East. When considering how to encourage people to move into new roles or locations, governments and firms often focus on extrinsic rewards — the pay, benefits or even visa facilitation that can influence an individual’s decision. But a growing range of research shows that these extrinsic rewards are only part of the picture. Together with the global management consulting firm Oliver Wyman, we set out to explore the other factors that should be taken into account.

Interested in working with us?

Get in touch at info@cogco.co

Copied to clipboard